Blog Fabulous

54 opinions for The First Mrs. McCain

• goodbyetoallfat
  Jun 13, 2008 at 4:34 am

  That is very eye-opening, Tracee!

  Although I a a Brit and therefore slightly less aware of your politics I am aware enough to know who John McCain is.

  The story would be as interesting if all the events you mention were referring to a UK politician — it’s just the behaviour of men!

  Yukkkkkkkk !!!!!!!!!!

• that girl
  Jun 13, 2008 at 6:42 am

  I’ve always wondered what was up w/ his wife..at first I thought it must be his daughter and then I realized what was up.

  I’m amazed at the trash circulating about Dem. candidates claiming that they are not ‘about’ religion or religious values and then the Republican candidates are given the golden ticket/free pass simply because they are ‘republican’…I”m so disgusted and dissapointed that people can’t just be objective and sensible. When it comes down to it, any candidate that has made it this far in the race has done at least a little shady stuff..they’ve made mistakes. Do we really need to make stuff up in viral e-mails about Obama being the muslim anti-Christ and Hillary hoping to literally bust the balls of male politicians. Why are we stooping this low?

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 13, 2008 at 7:09 am

  Last night I saw Cindy McCain criticizing Michelle Obama - I thought, “aren’t you the adultress husband-stealing (blank) who stole a crippled woman’s man? Do you really think you’re one to be casting stones? Nice glass house.”

  No free pass from me for John McCain or his trophy bride.

  Republicans criticize morality when it’s Dems, but profess “absolution and forgiveness” when it’s their own politicians.

  Enough with the double standard.

• that girl
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:09 am

  That’s what I’m saying. I’m frustrated there is no actual candidate for (what I believe are)Christian values or principles or whatever. Just a bunch of mud-slinging, finger-pointing, name calling mess.

• cathy
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:34 am

  I agree there is NO candidate running with what I would also call Christian values.
  I know Mccain is the only one against abortion though and the other 2 are for partial birth abortion. Look that up and see what it says..

  I also do not believe it is fair for people to lump all Replublicans in one group or religious conservatives in one group, like they are ALL evil or ALL believe the same thing or ALL vote for the same person. That is not true. Some republicans can acatually think and have brains just like democrats and do vote issue by issue and candidate by candidate.

• cathy
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:36 am

  Mccain’s new wife couldn’t just steal him away..a husband has to be WILLING to go. lol

• that girl
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:50 am

  That’s exactly what I AM implying Cathy. Because it’s been my experience that many Christians will vote for a Republican candidate simply because they equate Republican=Christan values…I used to too..Until I woke up and realized that all Republicans say they are for the little guy and they are against abortion and they are this and they are that - but how many republicans have been in office in the last 20 years? How many have banned abortion?

  I’m sick, sick, sick of my faith being manipulated for politican gain. I’m sick of my fears being exploited for political gan.. I’ve had enough of it. And I’ve also had enough of other Christians trying to guilt me into supporting Republicans.

• that girl
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:52 am

  And you’re exactly right Cathy - he DOES have to be willing to go, and after cheating on his crippled wife who stuck w/ him through separation and war, he WAS willing to go.

• Ashley S.
  Jun 13, 2008 at 8:55 am

  Partial birth abortions are horrible. They are not used as birth control - they are used in situations where the baby is severly, severly disabled or in which the mother’s life is at risk.. I seriously doubt ANY candidates or human beings are actually FOR such a thing. Not wanting to ban such a thing is not a vote FOR such a thing.

• Rebecca
  Jun 13, 2008 at 9:02 am

  So are these three people standing McCain’s kids with his first wife?

• Ashley S.
  Jun 13, 2008 at 9:13 am

  He adopted the oldest two (hers) and they had the yougest one together.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 13, 2008 at 10:39 am

  I think Barack Obama IS a committed Christian and I like his family values.

  I think all Christians should be wary of anyone proclaiming he’s “not Christian enough” or he’s Muslim (meant to imply he’s a terrorist).

  You could be next.

  It’s the kind of logic and gossip/whisper campaign Hitler used which led to the Holocaust and World War II. That kind of whispering and and “us or them” mentality also lead to the Holocaust in Rwanda. We’ve got pastors all over this country preaching a Holy War with Nation of Islam and that’s just plain dangerous. And John McCain’s wooing them.

  It reeks of McCarthyism.

  I want nothing to do with it.

• Rebecca
  Jun 13, 2008 at 10:55 am

  I do think it’s not right to cast Cindy as a husband-stealer. I don’t think you can steal someone else’s husband, as if he has no say in the matter. It is entirely a married person’s choice to stay or leave. I guess that goes to the whole “alienation of affection” debate.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 13, 2008 at 11:11 am

  hmmm. I thought I was casting John McCain as a cheating adulterer who lacks integrity, judgment or compassion. (Alienation of affection - the poor wife did break her pelvis and lost literally 5 inches from surgeries.)

  After listening to Republicans bitch about Bill Clinton in such a self-righteous way for about a decade, I just wonder how they’re going to come to terms with voting for one. (Unless that really wasn’t their problem with Bill Clinton, after all.)

  Turn about is fair play.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 13, 2008 at 1:03 pm

  Marianne Williamson, from a Course in Miracles says I should give up all “attack thoughts” because they will block the impulse of love and “the light” and will keep me from “experiencing miracles.”

  So, I guess I will stop here. I still think it’s only fair that the Republican Right’s Candidate be held to it’s own “moral standard.”

  But, I guess I’ll leave them to it. (I write as I can’t resist just one more dig - maybe you get better at it with practice?:)

• Ashley S.
  Jun 13, 2008 at 2:04 pm

  Good point about Clinton - that’s what I mean.. I’ve gotten my last forward concerning this crap -AT WORK! I wrote up a lengthy response and sent it out.

• Rebecca
  Jun 13, 2008 at 9:16 pm

  Alienation of affection is a type of lawsuit where you sue the person who “stole” your husband/wife.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 14, 2008 at 8:58 am

  He married her One Month Later, he cheated with her for a while.

  Cindy’s hardly someone who can take a morally superior position against Michelle Obama - not according to Republican Conservative Moral Standards. According to the Religious Conservative Right’s moral standards she should pretty much have a Scarlet A branded across her forehead for life.

  Certainly, we wouldn’t be seeing any WOMAN in the running with this history - abandoning husband and kids. I heard enough crap about the moral flaws of Hillary when she was the one being cheated ON. I also heard from conservatives that she was a bad mother because she worked. Really, where’s the standard for a “bad husband and father?” in the case of John McCain?

• that girl
  Jun 14, 2008 at 12:02 pm

  It’s the same double standard that spurred Republicans to rake Bill Clinton over the coals for smoking pot in his younger years, but then laughed off Bush’s cocaine habit..

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 14, 2008 at 12:59 pm

  No kidding. Not to mention his DUI.

• Merry
  Jun 15, 2008 at 8:17 pm

  All I can say is Wow. I had no idea - I admired McCain because of his war record. Wow. How low can you get?????
  I have decided not to vote this election because I was for Bush, and now I absolutely do not trust my own judgement when it comes to politics.
  Off Subject - Hey Tracee - I am originally from Houston. My grandparents were from Tyler and Henderson. Saw your pink hair blog where you said you lived in east Tex

• Merry
  Jun 15, 2008 at 8:26 pm

  I hope the first Mrs. McCain is still receiving alimony, and took him for all he was worth. This story actually makes me ill, and to think what the kids went through…

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 4:27 am

  Partial birth abortion used when the woman’s life is in danger as mentioned is ridiculous.
  If a baby can be born half way out, stabbed with scissors in the head (look it up) and KILLED…then how in the heck can that endanger the mother’s life more than being born the REST OF THE WAY! That is ridiculous..even if the baby is deformed..I guess some people if they dont get a perfect child can just kill one and hope for a better one the next time?!
  Mccain was a scumbag for cheating on his wife, so was Bill clinton. But Hillary isn’t too bright either STAYING with a man that does that. And if some say well that is HER choice (true) and has nothing to do with politics, then why isn’t it the same for McCain who chose not to stay with his wife..that is a personal choice too…hhmm..maybe some democrats have a double standard too? Id rather vote for someone who leaves his wife , then thinks it is OK to kill innocent babies who do NOT have a choice at all.

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 4:28 am

  I see I am awaiting moderation..lol

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 4:30 am

  Ok that one saying I am awaiting didnt need moderation. .I guess just the long one with my opinon does. lol

• that girl
  Jun 16, 2008 at 6:10 am

  I found a quote online from the first Mrs. McCain in which she basically said that John’s affairs (s!) had nothing to do w/ the war or time apart or whatever..they had to do w/ him turning 40 and wanting to feel 25 again.

  I think that’s enough to turn any wife’s stomach.. is that not all of our worst fear?

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 7:15 am

  Ok why is MY comment still awaiting moderation..and others get through? I reread it and nothing out of the ordinary with comments! or is it cuz I usually vote republican? LOL..hhmmm….maybe that is it.

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 7:16 am

  Partial birth abortion used when the woman’s life is in danger as mentioned is ridiculous.
  If a baby can be born half way out, stabbed with scissors in the head (look it up) and KILLED…then how in the heck can that endanger the mother’s life more than being born the REST OF THE WAY! That is ridiculous..even if the baby is deformed..I guess some people if they dont get a perfect child can just kill one and hope for a better one the next time?!
  Mccain was a scumbag for cheating on his wife, so was Bill clinton. But Hillary isn’t too bright either STAYING with a man that does that. And if some say well that is HER choice (true) and has nothing to do with politics, then why isn’t it the same for McCain who chose not to stay with his wife..that is a personal choice too…hhmm..maybe some democrats have a double standard too? Id rather vote for someone who leaves his wife , then thinks it is OK to kill innocent babies who do NOT have a choice at all.

  Your comment is awaiting moderation.

  I tried copying and pasting..maybe I did somethign wrong somewhere so Ill try this..sorry if it will be a repeat now.

• cathy
  Jun 16, 2008 at 7:19 am

  Ok forget it..i give up. by the time the moderation one gets thorugh it wont make any sense being out of order. are opinions being moderated?

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 16, 2008 at 8:11 am

  I’m Sorry Cathy - none of the comments are supposed to be moderated on this blog. I don’t know what’s up with that. I take Sundays off.

  If you want to reduce abortion in the most effective way possible Cathy - I would recommend voting for health care so that women can have access to contraception that prevents pregnancy.

  It’s the compassionate and Christ-like thing to do for All Americans.

  The more personal responsibility women can take over their own reproductive health the fewer unwanted pregnancies and therefore the fewer abortions there will be. Currently women are the most likely to be uninsured and that is a major cause of abortion.

  I suspect having McCain nominate a Supreme Court justice who will overturn Roe v. Wade will have little actual effect at all of reducing the number of abortions. (In effect we’ll just have a bunch of illegal abortions like we did before Roe v. Wade) We outlawed drugs and look at our massive problem with them.

  Be EFFECTIVE about reducing abortion and vote healthcare.

• that girl
  Jun 16, 2008 at 8:30 am

  Cathy - Hillary’s choice to stay w/ Bill is actually right in line w/ Christian values…the thing is - since she’s Democratic, conservative Republicans have found a way to twist this into sinful behavior.. John McCain chose to break his vows..Hillary Clinton chose to HONOR hers. How do you see that as “the same”?

  And for the record, I”M not a democrat..I”m not really an anything. I’m just SICK of things being twisted for political gain.. I”m sick of Christians angrily defending Republican sinners while raking sinful Democrats over the coals. Let’s call this thing what it is! Are there ANY candidates in America who truly are for Christian values? Do you understand what I mean Cathy? Why is that so hard to admit? Why do Republicans cling to the closest thing instead of demanding the real thing?

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 16, 2008 at 9:42 am

  I think Obama IS for Christian Values.

  One of his primary objectives is to help the sick - just as Jesus told us we should.

• Karen
  Jun 16, 2008 at 7:51 pm

  I don’t agree with what John McCain did. I think you need to remember that this was nearly THIRTY years ago!!!!

• Gerald
  Jun 16, 2008 at 8:11 pm

  If Mccain cheated on his wife, he was wrong, but that was 30 years ago, people change. Bill cheated on his wife, while in office, then LIED about it repeatedly under oath. That is a serious problem. Bill also LIED about smoking pot.

  I spent 5 years in the USMC, and had I lied under oath, and been caught, I would have spent time in a federal prison. You want to talk about a double standard. Dems say it was no big deal that he cheated, lied, and then lied again, but if a Rep cheated 30 years ago, we should throw him to the sharks. What a load of poo.

  That has nothing to do with Hillary though. Hillary has been involved in several ileagal, and immoral acts since she began her political career. She is a liar, just like her husband.

  Your opinion about healthcare is ridiculous, the quality of healthcare will decrease, the wait will increase, and it will NOT stop, reduce, or help abortion in any way whatsoever. Look at ANY country with universal healthcare, and you see how foolish it is.

  I wish there was someone great to vote for this time, but there just isn’t. Obama certainly is NOT trustworthy, look at all the questionable close relationships he has had over the past several years. not to mention the fact that noone scan name one accomplishment he has made, other than being elected. Which is not an accomplishment at all. He has served 6 months as a senator, that hardly qualifies him to lead the free world.

  OK, beat me up. That is what you do, when faced with truth.

• that girl
  Jun 17, 2008 at 5:51 am

  You’re exactly right about Bill Clinton. I was horrified at the time and still am. As a wife and mother it was beyond offensive and a long, long way from “no big deal”..my point is that both sides seem to be willing to blow off the bad behavior of their candidates - THAT is the problem. You seem outraged that Clinton would lie about a personal affair, yet you didn’t even acknowledge our current president (and vice president) lying about nuclear weapons.. and never taking responsibility for it.

  Republicans are particularly disturbing to me because they use religion - MY religion that I hold sacred - to push forward their candidates when in reality, their candidates are usually not Christian men.. I don’t know what your bible says, but in mine, Jesus got very angry in the New Testament at people who were USING God’s word and God’s church to manipulate people for personal gain.

  Also, they keep using this abortion issue..and it’s just a tactic. If republican candidates were really “against” abortion, it would have been banned by now. It’s an issue they strategically use to pull at the heart strings of Christian voters. And it’s a bunch of crap. It’s like a Democratic candidate saying they’re ‘against’ guns..yet, we still have personal handguns riding around in the front seat of every pick-up truck driving Good ole Boy in America.

  I’m tired of BOTH parties fighting so hard for their ’side’ that issues get swept away, the truth gets twisted and crap NEVER gets done. Surely you can see that?

• Gerald
  Jun 17, 2008 at 6:41 am

  I NEVER said anything about religion, and republicans. In fact I HATE religion. It is one of the biggest problems we face in America. This country has been destroyed by a spirtit of religiosity. Everyone is religious, and no one has a relationship with Jesus.

  You say republicans use religion to push forward candidates, and I think you are incorrect. Religious people use religion to push their candidate forward. Everyone was talking about Obama and him being a member of the same church for 20 years, right up until they found out his pastor was an anti-american psyco. Then they changed their talk. Yes, Jesus did get ticked at the religious people, and so do I, that is the people that are using religion to push their agenda. The fact is, Jesus was not a Republican or a Democrat.

  You are correct, Republicans have failed us on the abortion issue for years, however, allowing a pro-abortion president will cause the problem to get worse, and will allow partial-birth abortion and stem-cell research. I can also imagine that women will be getting pregnant, for the purpose of selling their baby for research.

  Bush was wrong about the WMDs, but not becasue he lied, He was not there digging around looking, he is our president. He was told there were WMDs and he responded. We were attacked, and he responded to our attackers as he saw nessesary, and I commend him for that. That is called being Defensive.

  Ask anyone in the military, and they will tell you they support him. That was not the case when Billy was in office. I hope you are not gonna say that is because ALL military folks are republicans, becasue that is NOT the case. The reason is because they feel like what Bush did was the right thing to do, and most Dems agreed with him, right after we were attacked. now they are pushing an agenda, and it doesn’t match up. I am sure if we were attacted again, they would be back on board. Also look around on any military base and see if you can find someone that supports Obama for president, that just ain’t gonna happen either.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 17, 2008 at 6:51 am

  Anti-American - I think the Republican refrain is “We hate the government - can’t trust them.”

  How is that Pro-American?

  In America we’re allowed to criticize our Gov.

  Bush exploited - yes EXPLOITED - an emotionally traumatizing 9-11 experience shared by all American people.

  Rick Noriega is running for Senate, currently a state Senator AND a Lt. Col. in the National Guard. He served his state term in Afghanistan because his unit was called up. He is running for US Senate as a Dem. who believes the war has served it’s purpose.

• that girl
  Jun 17, 2008 at 9:58 am

  Going into Afganistan was “defensive”…invading Iraq was a completely different scenario.

• Violet
  Jun 18, 2008 at 12:12 pm

  “Look at ANY country with universal healthcare, and you see how foolish it is.”

  I love opinions from people who obviously are too lazy to go beyond rumor and the sound bite.

  You are confusing socialized medicine (canada, ) with universal coverage. Under Hillary’s plan, most people would keep the exact same insurance they already have. Those who don’t have access would be allowed to join the insurance plan congress uses. NOT THE SAME AT ALL.

• Gerald
  Jun 18, 2008 at 12:50 pm

  It is only a matter of time before we go to Socialised medicine if the US adopts her plan. Maybe you should take your head out of the sand.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 18, 2008 at 1:52 pm

  Because the sky is falling Gerald? (I mean K).

  I’ve had about enough of the McCarthy-like cries of “socialist! socialist!”

  A. It’s not Hillary’s plan. It’s essentially Mitt Romney’s plan - a Republican Gov. who has insured his entire state. SUCCESSFULLY.
  B. Universal Health simply insures ALL Americans with PRIVATE Insurance through private insurance companies. Which saves tax payers millions of dollars and puts a stop to much of healthcare inflation.
  C. Barack Obama’s plan doesn’t even have a mandatory clause so YOU can still stay irresponsibly uninsured expecting fellow Americans to pick up the tab if the worst should happen to you.
  D. Really, you should do some research to figure out why you would be against health INSURANCE for your Fellow Americans. That’s real nice of you. Real Compassionate.

• Gerald
  Jun 18, 2008 at 2:42 pm

  Are you refering to the plan that is $400, million over budget, and has a 1/4 million people that are STILL uninsured? That sound like a great plan. Where do I sign up?

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 19, 2008 at 6:03 am

  Ok Gerald.

  Look out there might be some actual solutions to the the healthcare crisis in America. What would we do without the problems?

• kellys
  Jun 20, 2008 at 9:12 am

  From a health care worker’s POV, universal healthcare is exactly what we need. There are definitely not enough people who can paint their houses, ride a harley, mow their grass, cut down trees, and still be eligible for complete disability. Just this past week, I have had 2 patients who come into the hospital on yours and my dime thanks to the government for heart caths. When we ask them what they do, they say “I am on disability.”
  “Oh really, what is wrong?”
  “I have 2 hearniated disks, “or “I have a bad back,” or “I have a busted shoulder.”
  “I’m so sorry. What have you been doing to get help?”
  “Nothing. I just live with it”
  And then I get mad! I work with 2 men and know several others that work with bad backs and have had either surgery or rehab. They still hurt every day but come to work anyway so that these people who choose to live on our dime can sit around and enjoy a vacation on us. My coworkers can’t do that.
  And to top it all off, those that really can’t work have to apply several times or get a lawyer to get their disability when they are in wheelcharis and really can’t work.
  But please. Feel free to give YOUR paycheck over to those who don’t deserve it. Just don’t ask me to work and take time away from my kids to pay for it.
  Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 20, 2008 at 9:16 am

  Universal healthcare isn’t a welfare program. It has zero to do with disability benefits.

  Universal healthcare allows Americans to BUY health insurance from private companies.

• kellys
  Jun 20, 2008 at 9:21 am

  Same principle if you take the time to look at it. I don’t mean to sound hateful here but I am tired of our healthcare being taken advantage of by government programs. Now you want the government to dictate to private healthcare or even the healthcare plan that the congress uses to let everyone in. Why not just let freemarket take care of it? I might be a conservative (notice I didn’t say Republican) but I still want everyone to have adequate healthcare. I just don’t think the government has been wise with the money we have given them in the past and I sure as heck don’t want them sticking their noses in another single area of my pocket. Which we all must admit will happen.

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 20, 2008 at 9:37 am

  It is not the same principle. You’re arguing against socialized medicine. Which isn’t the same thing as Universal Healthcare.

  The “Free Market” is doing a terrible job that’s why. The insurance companies have raped and pillaged the American people long enough. They have proven themselves greedy and untrustworthy. They discriminate against people and they charge ridiculously expensive rates for individuals (like small business owners) and they don’t pay up when it’s time.

  Every insurance company in America will bid on the large pool of people who will be allowed to Buy Private Health Insurance under Universal Healthcare. They will still make gargantuan profits.

  I want my health needs to be motivated by healing not by profit. Profit is the most suspect motive there is.

  Currently, the insurance business is concerned ONLY with it’s own profit. I have power with my government in a democracy - no power at all over the corrupt health insurance industry that is raping this nation’s healthcare.

  I currently pay for every single uninsured American’s catastrophe through health care inflation and welfare programs.

  I just think we can be “thriftier” about it. Pay for the health insurance premium instead of waiting to pay for the catastrophe.

  And you are right - a bunch of people choose not to buy health insurance - which is the same as choosing for us to pay their health costs when they have a car accident or get cancer. Right now they really can’t afford to buy the insurance because the insurance companies have run unchecked for decades - discriminating against the sick, charging unbelievably expensive rates for individuals.

  But, once everyone has access to an affordable policy regardless of their employment situation they will no longer have that excuse.

  This will cut taxes and it will cut health care inflation.

• Gerald
  Jun 20, 2008 at 10:05 am

  Gas prices are high too, and my food at the restaurant cost $8 a person, and groceries keep going up and up. You are correct tracy, but lets not stop with healthcare, I think we should have universal farming, and universal oil companies, heck, EVERYONE should just give everything they have to the government, and let them work it all out. They seem to be pretty good with money.

  SARCASM, just one more service I offer.

• kellys
  Jun 20, 2008 at 10:10 am

  AMEN!!!

• that girl
  Jun 20, 2008 at 11:34 am

  I don’t think you two are getting what this thing is.. If I’m understanding it right - it would force the ins. companies to take anyone, and it would force EVERYONE to be insured (like your car insurance). I understand the point about not wanting the government in your pocket - but right now, the ins. companies have the government in THEIR pocket..so which is worse? What they’re proposing would be a reversal - the government making them (and us) play fair.

  Also, I agree w/ a statement I heard Michael Moore say one time..he was talking about how much he loved America and how America (government) used to really do things right, they used to be efficient, they used to take care of the average man, and we used to trust them. You really have to ask yourself when the tides changed on that one. You really have to ask yourself exactly which ones out of the long line of men we’ve elected over the years started to use and abuse that trust.. And if we don’t demand change from the present politicians - how will we ever get that trust back?

  Also, in the disability scenario - is that going to be fixed by the government? or personal accountability ? or just plain moral behavior on our part?

• Tracee Sioux
  Jun 20, 2008 at 12:17 pm

  What’s your solution Gerald and Kellys?

• Hillary Still President?
  Aug 15, 2008 at 7:47 am

  […] on Michelle while she was pregnant with one of their daughters. (Wait, no we’re still allowing McCain to run on this adultery platform, so I guess he would have to have murdered his mistress to actual […]

• Lexie
  Sep 4, 2008 at 7:47 pm

  C’mon, y’all–more than half of marriages fail. It’s not divided along party lines or religious affiliation. It’s just a fact. If Carol McCain is going to vote for John McCain because she thinks he’s the better candidate, why won’t you consider him on his merits? If Carol McCain doesn’t hold a grudge against him for the divorce, why are you insisting that a grudge be held–even if you must hold it yourselves?
  This just seems silly to me.
  It boils down to this: do you want socialist principles to govern the USA, or do you want capitalist principles to define her? Socialism is a FAILED system. Capitalism, with all its bugs, still draws hopeful masses to the shores of America with the promise of prosperity and hope.

• betsy
  Oct 18, 2008 at 12:21 pm

  you all amase me as to what guy is good and which is bad! i can tell that some of you didnt watch the whole mess bill clinton was ‘accused’ of doing with that lewinsky groupie. and paula jones was nothing but a slut! her own family disowed her! this linda and the other broad set clinton up as they both being republicans didnt want him in the white house! also they hired some “dr’ to testify his spearm was on her dress?? why hadnt she had the dress cleaned?? somemore of the republicans tactics, at least he left this country in the black, with a surplus, look what bush has done! our grands will never get this paid down! ever!! both gals lost thier well paying jobs also linda lost her home and evrything. think the other gals name was lucy goldberg,her son now writes a column in our local paper every day. he hates all democrats with a passion. also bush wdnt hv been elected if he hadnt stole all the votes in fla,ohio,and overseas, right now the goverment is watching very close as so it cant happen again! bush will go down in history as the worst president in history! makes me sick to think of all the young kids who have died for what? condolezza rice ought to be tried for war crimes as shes the one who said irraq had mass weapons when they didnt! what a mess who does inherited bushs mess! so if you want the same vote for mcaine,,,,,

Have an opinion? Leave a comment:

• Use this area to discover new blogs and content in the b5media network.
• Beauty & Style
• Business
• Entertainment
• General
• Health & Wellness
• Lifestyles
• Music
• No Channel Selected
• Sports
• Team Blogs
• Technology
• Travel & Culture

• Social Web
• E-mail